Jared Moskowitz is the rare member of Congress who can hold a press event about recovered non-human materials and co-lead a bipartisan security bill in the same news cycle without anyone blinking. That's the week he's having. While the cameras follow him from the UFO briefing room to the Foreign Affairs hearing, the disclosure filings show 32 trades in the last 90 days, including a cluster of 15 transactions logged on a single afternoon in March. The public record is right there. It always is.
The News Peg: Two Headlines, One Member
Moskowitz is currently pulling double duty on the attention economy. He's co-leading the bipartisan Jewish American Security Act, a bill squarely in the wheelhouse of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, where he actually sits. That one makes sense on paper.
Then there's the other headline. On June 9, Moskowitz joined a bipartisan group including Tim Burchett, Eric Burlison, and Anna Paulina Luna to urge President Trump to grant sweeping immunity to UAP whistleblowers. Former Air Force officer David Grusch, who testified in 2023 about secret programs and what he described as recovered non-human materials, was at the Capitol Hill gathering. The UFO disclosure push is a recurring feature of Moskowitz's public persona, sitting at the intersection of his Judiciary Committee assignment and a genuine appetite for the strange.
Security policy, extraterrestrial accountability, floor votes on banking bills he has no committee jurisdiction over. Busy schedule. Busy brokerage account.
The March 31 Avalanche
Fifteen trades, one day. March 31, 2026.
That afternoon's disclosures show Moskowitz purchasing American Express, Broadcom, Chubb, Cencora, GE Aerospace, General Dynamics, Home Depot, McDonald's, Motorola Solutions, Palo Alto Networks, and Parker Hannifin, while selling Caterpillar, Cummins, and Qualcomm. Each in the ,000 to 5,000 range, except the Qualcomm sale, which came in at 5,000 to $50,000.
That's a lot of decisions for one afternoon. The full 90-day picture, documented in his disclosure record on Blind Trust, runs to 32 trades total. Fourteen purchases and one sale in a single session is either a portfolio rebalance, a managed-account batch execution, or something else. The filing doesn't say which. It rarely does.
Members are required to disclose. They are not required to explain, contextualize, recuse, or even look mildly self-conscious about the volume. That's the rule. Yes, really.
The Broadcom Trade and the Committee Overlap
Here's where the data gets specific.
Moskowitz purchased Broadcom on March 31, 2026. According to the scored sample in his disclosure record, that trade posted a 30-day alpha of 21.7 percentage points above the S&P 500. That's the best single-trade result in his recent history. It's also flagged as a committee overlap trade, under Technology, given his committee assignments.
He has two prior Broadcom purchases as well, both dated October 10, 2025, one in the ,000 to 5,000 range and one in the 5,000 to $50,000 range. Both posted 30-day alpha of 9.4 percentage points. He has been buying Broadcom repeatedly. Broadcom keeps going up after he buys it. The scored sample doesn't tell us why. It just tells us what happened.
For context on what that committee overlap means: Moskowitz sits on the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and its Oversight and Intelligence subcommittee, and on the House Committee on the Judiciary. The Technology overlap designation reflects the breadth of what those committees touch in terms of export controls, foreign investment reviews, and surveillance technology, not a formal Financial Services or Commerce Committee seat. The overlap is real. The implications are yours to weigh.
The American Express Pattern
The Broadcom trade is not the only flagged name in his portfolio. Moskowitz bought American Express on October 10, 2025, twice: once in the ,000 to 5,000 range and once in the 5,000 to $50,000 range. Both trades are logged with a committee overlap under Financial Services and both posted 30-day alpha of 13.8 percentage points.
Then, on March 31, he bought American Express again, this time in the ,000 to 5,000 range. That most recent purchase is in the disclosed trades list but is not yet in the scored alpha sample, so we don't have a 30-day result on it yet.
Pause for a second: Moskowitz does not sit on the House Committee on Financial Services. He sits on Foreign Affairs and Judiciary. A floor vote on a banking bill is not a committee-level conflict for him, and his May 20 votes in favor of the American Access to Banking Act and the Community Bank Deposit Access Act are exactly that: floor votes on bills outside his committee remit. Those votes are not a conflict-of-interest angle. They're just votes.
The American Express committee overlap designation appears to stem from the broader scored-sample methodology, not from a Financial Services seat. Readers should weigh that context accordingly.
The Full Scorecard, Without Cherry-Picking
The alpha record across 54 scored trades: 30 positive, 24 negative. Mean 30-day alpha of 0.3 percentage points. It's barely above flat.
The headline-grabbing trades, the Broadcom at plus-21.7 and the American Express at plus-13.8, exist alongside real losers. He sold Tractor Supply on March 23 in two tranches (one at 5,000 to $50,000, one at ,000 to 5,000) and both posted 30-day alpha of negative 10.0 percentage points. He sold Automatic Data Processing the same day, a ,000 to 5,000 position, which came in at negative 11.6 percentage points. Neither of those sales had a committee overlap flag. Sometimes the trades don't work.
The honest read on 30 wins and 24 losses at a mean of 0.3 is: a portfolio that outperforms very slightly on average, driven by a small number of outlier wins, with a loss rate of 44 percent. Call it what it is: not a streak, not a signal, not a scandal on its own. The committee overlap trades are the ones worth watching, because that's where oversight and trading intersect in the same person at the same time.
The Defense Buy Sitting Quietly in the Corner
One more item from the March 31 batch deserves a sentence. Moskowitz bought General Dynamics that day, in the ,000 to 5,000 range. General Dynamics builds submarines, fighter jets, and Stryker combat vehicles. Moskowitz sits on the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. His subcommittee covers East Asia and the Pacific.
The Venn diagram of "House Foreign Affairs member buying a major defense contractor" and "committee that oversees U.S. Posture in the Taiwan Strait" is two overlapping circles. How much they overlap is a question the disclosure rules don't answer. They just show you the circles.
What His Committees Actually Cover
It's worth being clear about the architecture here, because the committee assignments shape which trades carry an oversight angle and which don't.
Moskowitz is on Foreign Affairs, Foreign Affairs East Asia and Pacific, Foreign Affairs Oversight and Intelligence, Judiciary, Judiciary Crime and Federal Government Surveillance, Judiciary Oversight, and the Select Subcommittee on January 6. No Financial Services. No Armed Services. No Intelligence Committee (the standing one, not the Oversight subcommittee).
That means his votes on banking bills on May 20 are regular floor votes, not oversight plays. His interest in UFO disclosure runs through Judiciary's surveillance jurisdiction, not a dedicated intelligence mandate. And his defense and technology trades sit in a grey zone where Foreign Affairs oversight of dual-use technology and export controls creates a plausible, if indirect, overlap.
The Jewish American Security Act, by contrast, is a clean match: bipartisan, foreign-affairs-adjacent, well inside his lane. The bill and the committee fit. Whether the trades fit's a separate conversation.
The Receipts
Thirty-two trades in 90 days. Fifteen in a single afternoon. Broadcom up 21.7 points in 30 days after the last purchase. American Express bought three times, twice with a committee overlap flag. General Dynamics sitting there in the portfolio of a Foreign Affairs member focused on the Pacific. A mean alpha of 0.3 across 54 scored trades, with 24 losses baked in.
The full disclosure record is public and searchable. The receipts are public. Make of them what you make of them.